Видео

Sorry your description is completely wrong the try with the highest single chance of occurring is the first try, but the most likely try number that he opens the door is the fifth.

This is an example of where one should lay of his pen and just use shawty code to get an approximation

User wasn't specific enough. Post must be deleted before anyone sees it.

Me: *breaking spaghetti into two strips my entire life* Bro How to get multiple breaks-

Google relates to googol, a quantity or number. Obviously googol is not prime because googol is an even number greater than 2. In reality, the author of the prime number system was discussing a proof relating to quantities and terminology (i.e. the theory of types). Realistically, 1 and itself are the quantities 1 and 1. These quantities are prime in a sense that defies the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.

Then why were they playing with spaghetti? Explain i want to know

I’m a mathematician, and I’m here to say this didn’t stump us. You know what stumps us? Why can’t we pull a car using magnets. So stop lying lady.

Experiments in Topology by Stephen Barr published in 1964 presents an informal proof for this same ratio being the shortest possible mobius strip

So basically Albrecht Durer was the long-lost computer scientist of the 14 hundreds

interesting 👍

She breaking it in two pieces at the end was just perfect

I remember seeing this short during 2020..first lockdown, brought back some memories

I like this video a lot. It is very well done and helpful. Five stars: * * * * * !

Ego size x IQ = constant. Operation Ego and operation IQ commute. Thus you can measure a Trump size ego and his IQ with 100% certainty. But you have to be called MELANIA. Note: when ego is infinite IQ is almost zero

Agree with previous comment. She doesn't know the uncertainty principle. Neither does Neil deGrass Tyson.... The operators don't commute , then one can't measure they simultaneous will 100 % precision

I’m fairly certain that VSauce taught me that the singular of spaghetti is spaghetto.

Will Hunting is cooking

You're telling me, we went through 2 world wars, 7 major ones, and never had an idea why 2 long, thin, brittle beams snap that way?

My problems: who will be, whats next, what should i do in life And those mfs on crack problems: WHY THE F SPAGHETTI NEVER BREAKS INTO TWO PIECES?!?!?

Get well

This breakthrough will give world peace

Thanks!

ITS A SPAGETTO! NOT A SPAGETTI STICK

How can the fact that some np-completed problem is a p problem prove the fact that ALL np-completed problems are p?

How does not forgetting the fact that our universe, the only one we know, must allow us to exist, discourage us from seeking to understand our universe?

Love how she seemed to just effortlessly snap the spaghetti in two at the end

Try for practical

Fine work! I just spotted a small mistake in graphic representation. 1:20 you add amplitudes at 3π/4 and you find as result root(2) but in 1:30 you don't put the result root(2) over 3π/4 vertically but a little more to the right (just in the vertical line beside 3π/4). See black-red dot. At π/2 (in 1:32) you put the black-red dot at the correct position. I am very thankful for this beautiful representation for the Fourier's series and Fourier's transform applicability in engineering.

Question, how many terrors did Richard Feynman gets from the Italians?

Yes when some guy tries to ask you out... It is very possible.

Zero doesn't exist in this world. Energy is always transferred into something. Therefore everything is not 0 (as in Big Bang theory), it is 1. We are all one and will always be one. The number 0 is exterior to this universe and if anything represents God. Therefore 1 x 0 = 1

1 x 1 = 2

Remember! A spaghetto

Science is literally just fk around and find out. You tried everything until it succeed.

She broke it in hlaf at the end 😮

Synthesizer: Fourier Series Analyzer: Fourier Transform

*angry Italian noises*

u literally just break it in two at the last second

Having a Bioinformatics degree now, I would simply tell to collect data on all goats eating grass around the world and then do a statistical analysis. 💀

Really ? In both mathematics and logic classes in grad school we used this as the definition of "2" The difficult part was defining "1", and "addition"

there is no Alan Turing in the DNA of my desktop, and no Ada Lovelace. Absolutely zero. All of Turing's work was classified at Bletchley Park. It is unfortunate, but true, that Britain can claim nothing in computer history. Presper Eckert and John Mauchley built the first computer, and theirs was also the first commercial computer making outfit: UNIVAC. The next one was IBM, and then we all know about the Children Of The Sun, the "Pirates of Silicon Valley." It turns out computer history is as simple as aviation history. Not that it matters; it is just so much graffiti, just another brick in the wall.

Well, in some way, a trapezoid is somewhat of a half-assed parallelogram. 💀

Oddly enough the likelihood of living beings outside of our planetary system decoding/reading this is near zero. It is likely going to be read by an AI being(s), since all the biological beings are long extinct/pointless in comparison. The same fate is going to happen to us humans. The time frame of out existence is too tiny for this harsh universe.

She just break it in two like it was nothing

t=√(2h/g) t=√2*√(h/g) t have irational factor √2 maybe because that t almost always irational Amd have factor √1/g is irational too g=10

Should be Italian physicists

Those guys made a a machine to break speghetti into two but she break it just by hand

Italians being very silent after this dropped 🔥🔥😎

How piss of Italians:

0:24 The question originally came up when Gabriel realized that his horn needed to be painted.